Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-05 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-05 House Journal Page 1330 HB 69 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 1266) on the following at this time: HOUSE BILL NO. 69 "An Act relating to regulation of shallow natural gas leasing and closely related energy projects; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 69(RES) (same title) Representative Kohring moved that the House rescind its action in failing to concur in the Senate amendment (page 1252). Representative Kohring placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. 2003-05-05 House Journal Page 1331 The question being: "Shall the House rescind its action in failing to concur in the Senate amendment to HB 69?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS HB 69(RES) Rescind Previous Action/Fail to Concur YEAS: 27 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kookesh, Ogg, Seaton Excused: Cissna, Kapsner, Kerttula And so, the House rescinded its action. Representative Coghill moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to HB 69, thus adopting SCS HB 69(RES), and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to HB 69?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS HB 69(RES) Concur YEAS: 26 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kookesh, Moses, Ogg, Seaton Excused: Cissna, Kapsner, Kerttula And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS HB 69(RES). 2003-05-05 House Journal Page 1332 Representative Coghill moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS HB 69(RES) Concur Effective Date YEAS: 28 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kookesh, Moses Excused: Cissna, Kapsner, Kerttula And so, the effective date clause was adopted. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS HB 69(RES) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.